Re: Concurrent testing PostgreSQL Vs MySQL

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Durai <visolve_postgres(at)lycos(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Concurrent testing PostgreSQL Vs MySQL
Date: 2003-11-21 12:30:35
Message-ID: 3FBE056B.6060101@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Durai wrote:

> Hello Sridhar,
>
> Now, It works. Thanks lot.
>
> But Still I have doubt:
>
> 1. How MySQL works in this case? It has any default "autocommit"?

Depends. What version of mysql you are using? If you are using mysql 3.x and/or
non-innodb tables, you don't have transactions in first place. Mysql does not
need autocommit in earlier version because it does not have transactions in
first place.

> 2. Is there any other method to test for "concurrent testing"?

Against mysql? I doubt. You can try scaling number of concurrent connections and
number of rows in database. Furthermore don't do bulk update but do selective
random updates. And verify the results in your php section.

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-11-21 12:39:31 Re: Modelling Oracle Sequences
Previous Message Jason Tesser 2003-11-21 12:27:01 linking postgre to AD