Re: 7.4RC2 vs 7.4

From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Murtagh <christopher(dot)murtagh(at)mcgill(dot)ca>, postgres general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4RC2 vs 7.4
Date: 2003-11-20 01:26:31
Message-ID: 3FBC1847.6090301@trade-india.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
Has any thing happened from 7.4Rc2 to 7.4 that requires me<br>
to initdb , dump and reload?<br>
<br>
Regds<br>
Mallah.<br>
<br>
scott.marlowe wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midPine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)33(dot)0311181415550(dot)26776-100000(at)css120(dot)ihs(dot)com">
<pre wrap="">On 18 Nov 2003, Christopher Murtagh wrote:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Just wondering if there were indeed any changes between 7.4 and 7.4RC2.
I had to go live with 7.4RC2 on the weekend (it passed all of our tests
quite well and we needed some of its features). Was RC2 simply stamped
'Final' or were there any last fixes that I should worry about?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There was some issue with Solaris and IPV6/IPV4 or something like that
that popped up late in 7.4RC2 to 7.4 I believe. I think the decision was
that in order to fix it, postgresql would have to code around broken
operating systems, and that isn't something that postgresql should have to
do, i.e. let Solaris get fixed, or delay the fix until it can be better
tested and maybe roll it into a 7.4.x release.

Also, some code for dates was fixed at the last minute, to make postgresql
accept the uncommon but obviously correct date format of "1999-feb-02" or
something like that. It might affect your date handling, but shouldn't.
Again, I'm not sure exactly what was changed on this, but it's a place to
look on your test server before going live to 7.4.

Anything I miss / get wrong / leave out?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org">majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org</a> so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 2.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Parker 2003-11-20 02:42:50 newbie questions
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-11-20 01:19:26 Re: Two rules on a view do not like each other :-(