Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Date: 2003-11-13 04:23:52
Message-ID: 3FB30758.1000100@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches


ARRGGHH! It has a typo!. new patch shortly.

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor differences
> in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think I did too
> badly :-)
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
>>
>> $ initdb
>> The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user
>> "postgres".
>> This user must also own the server process.
>> ... etc etc...
>>
>> The first two lines of printout don't seem to be in the "highly
>> compatible" C version.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-13 04:29:15 Re: Successful proting report for 7.4beta4 on Irix and Altix
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:17:56 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:51:04 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:17:56 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:51:04 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:17:56 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C