From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C |
Date: | 2003-11-13 04:17:56 |
Message-ID: | 3FB305F4.2030107@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor differences
in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think I did too
badly :-)
cheers
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
>What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
>
>$ initdb
>The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "postgres".
>This user must also own the server process.
>... etc etc...
>
>The first two lines of printout don't seem to be in the "highly
>compatible" C version.
>
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
initdb.c.patch | text/plain | 622 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-13 04:23:52 | Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-13 03:52:42 | Re: ARC buffer strategy committed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-13 04:23:52 | Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-13 02:29:00 | Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-13 04:23:52 | Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-13 03:53:12 | Re: "make check" improvement for cygwin |