Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Date: 2003-11-13 04:17:56
Message-ID: 3FB305F4.2030107@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Apologies. Here's the patch. There may be other very minor differences
in wording, too. But if that's all I missed I won't think I did too
badly :-)

cheers

andrew

Tom Lane wrote:

>What's become of initdb's initial note about who you are?
>
>$ initdb
>The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "postgres".
>This user must also own the server process.
>... etc etc...
>
>The first two lines of printout don't seem to be in the "highly
>compatible" C version.
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
initdb.c.patch text/plain 622 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:23:52 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-13 03:52:42 Re: ARC buffer strategy committed

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:23:52 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-13 02:29:00 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-13 04:23:52 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-13 03:53:12 Re: "make check" improvement for cygwin