From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Comparing databases |
Date: | 2003-11-12 04:03:39 |
Message-ID: | 3FB1B11B.9080809@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>Ugh. I know I might be a little more sensitive than most on this point, but it kind of begs the question why did the supporting companies fail. Why volunteer that?
>
>
With due respect, at least two companies (pgSQL, Inc. and Command
Prompt, Inc.) have a long standing stability within the open source
community. Actually now that I think about it, we are older than pgSQL,
Inc. ;). Anyway I think it would be more worth stating that
their is long standing, stable companies available to support PostgreSQL
versus the fact that PostgreSQL has survived bad VC investment (no offense).
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-11-12 04:22:18 | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-11-12 03:59:15 | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL |