Re: Comparing databases

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-12 04:03:39
Message-ID: 3FB1B11B.9080809@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


>Ugh. I know I might be a little more sensitive than most on this point, but it kind of begs the question why did the supporting companies fail. Why volunteer that?
>
>

With due respect, at least two companies (pgSQL, Inc. and Command
Prompt, Inc.) have a long standing stability within the open source
community. Actually now that I think about it, we are older than pgSQL,
Inc. ;). Anyway I think it would be more worth stating that
their is long standing, stable companies available to support PostgreSQL
versus the fact that PostgreSQL has survived bad VC investment (no offense).

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-12 04:22:18 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-12 03:59:15 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL