Re: Comparing databases

From: "Ned Lilly" <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
To: "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-12 03:53:11
Message-ID: 00f301c3a8d0$7fa74b40$7d931843@Ned
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> > -- Durability: The PostgreSQL project is 16 years old, with years more
> > experience than most comparable databases, commercial or OSS. PostgreSQL
> > has already survived the death of several supporting companies and will
> > be around for a long time to come.

Ugh. I know I might be a little more sensitive than most on this point, but it kind of begs the question why did the supporting companies fail. Why volunteer that?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-12 03:59:15 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-12 03:44:26 Re: Comparing databases