Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Date: 2003-11-11 07:17:23
Message-ID: 3FB08D03.10207@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> I'm confused. This is exactly an example of what I was suggesting that we
> don't want to do. Did you offer it in that sense, or some other way?

I actually have always thought that the MySQL gotchas page was objective
and well-researched. It's not an "argument" as such, just facts.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-11-11 11:28:01 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-11 06:55:39 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL