Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Date: 2003-11-11 11:28:01
Message-ID: 20031111112800.GA17620@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:17:23PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >I'm confused. This is exactly an example of what I was suggesting that
> >we don't want to do. Did you offer it in that sense, or some other way?
>
> I actually have always thought that the MySQL gotchas page was objective
> and well-researched. It's not an "argument" as such, just facts.

I think the point is that it's not important if it is true or not, facts
or not; we shouldn't be showing someone else's problems to whoever wants
to know about Postgres.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
A male gynecologist is like an auto mechanic who never owned a car.
(Carrie Snow)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-11-11 12:35:55 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-11 07:17:23 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL