From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What do you want me to do? |
Date: | 2003-11-07 20:28:45 |
Message-ID: | 3FAC007D.9030904@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>
>
>>I know most people have talked about using bugzilla, but is anyone
>>familiar with GNATS? I'm currently rereading Open Sources and there's a
>>paragraph or two mentioning it's use and the fact that it can be
>>interfaced with completely by email.
>>
>>
>
>FreeBSD uses it almost exclusively and it supports email interaction with
>the database, but I don't think there are very many good GUI front ends
>for it (or, at least, not that I've seen) ...
>
>
>
No.
A few other thoughts:
. the Samba team have apparently abandoned their own tool and moved to
bugzilla
. if we used bugzilla this might give some impetus to the bugzilla
team's efforts to provide pg as a backend (maybe we could help with that)
. it would seem slightly strange to me for an RDBMS project to use a bug
tracking system that was not RDBMS-backed
. developers are far more likely to be familiar with bugzilla
. are there any active developers without web access? If not, why is
pure email interaction important?
Bugzilla is far from perfect. But it's getting better.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-11-07 20:29:11 | Re: Experimental ARC implementation |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-11-07 20:25:58 | Re: Performance features the 4th |