Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the
Date: 2003-11-05 13:15:36
Message-ID: 3FA8F7F8.1070602@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Paul Ganainm wrote:
> Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any
> show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on
> PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round?

Personally I think native windows port is plus that interbase/firebird has over
postgresql. It also has native threaded model which *could* be benefitial at times.

I combed docs once or twice. It looks like the linux/unix support is failry new
so I don't know how it stacks in production and performance.

OTOH, I don't like storing entire database in one file. That could get messy.
Otherwise two databases are on par, at least on paper. I hope SQL compliance of
interbase/firebird is better than mysql and closer to postgresql, +/- delta.

Of course PG has it's own goodies. Rules/Create language are just tip of iceberg.

Can you come up with some relative comparison? We can help you from postgresql
side..:-) That would be great.

Bye
Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Franco Bruno Borghesi 2003-11-05 14:05:46 Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's
Previous Message Paul Ganainm 2003-11-05 10:28:25 Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the performance like compared to PostgreSQL?