From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the |
Date: | 2003-11-05 13:15:36 |
Message-ID: | 3FA8F7F8.1070602@myrealbox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Paul Ganainm wrote:
> Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any
> show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on
> PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round?
Personally I think native windows port is plus that interbase/firebird has over
postgresql. It also has native threaded model which *could* be benefitial at times.
I combed docs once or twice. It looks like the linux/unix support is failry new
so I don't know how it stacks in production and performance.
OTOH, I don't like storing entire database in one file. That could get messy.
Otherwise two databases are on par, at least on paper. I hope SQL compliance of
interbase/firebird is better than mysql and closer to postgresql, +/- delta.
Of course PG has it's own goodies. Rules/Create language are just tip of iceberg.
Can you come up with some relative comparison? We can help you from postgresql
side..:-) That would be great.
Bye
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Franco Bruno Borghesi | 2003-11-05 14:05:46 | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's |
Previous Message | Paul Ganainm | 2003-11-05 10:28:25 | Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the performance like compared to PostgreSQL? |