From: | Franco Bruno Borghesi <franco(at)akyasociados(dot)com(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's |
Date: | 2003-11-05 14:05:46 |
Message-ID: | 1068041145.783.10.camel@taz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
About a year ago I programmed a php/firebird application, and I've never
had a problem with firebird. It's a small database (a few megabytes),
but it just works day after day.
I've seen firebird has updatable views, they seem to work very well.
I have the feeling that It's not as flexible as postgresql, but I still
like it. It would be my choice for win32 applications (until win32
postgresql port become available).
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 07:28, Paul Ganainm wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have just started with PostgreSQL on Linux and in the past I've done a
> good bit of work on Interbase (both on Windows and Linux).
>
>
> What I want to know here is
>
>
> What do people here think of Interbase/Firebird?
>
>
> Has anybody done performance metrics or could they point me to a
> comparison between the two?
>
>
> Does Interbase/Firebird have (as far as people here are concerned) any
> show-stoppers in terms of functionality which they do have on
> PostgreSQL? Or, indeed, the other way round?
>
>
> I'm not interested in starting a flame war or anything like that - just
> a presentation of the facts as you see them, and if you want to put in
> your opinion also, that's fine, just make a note!
>
>
> TIA.
>
>
> Paul...
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | radha.manohar | 2003-11-05 17:35:22 | Re: Response time |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-11-05 13:15:36 | Re: Interbase/Firebird - any users out there - what's the |