Re: slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere
Date: 2003-11-03 14:25:21
Message-ID: 3FA66551.6060005@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Neil Conway wrote:

> I haven't seen this posted here:
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/03/127244.shtml?tid=126&tid=163&tid=98&tid=99

You should have read the commentary. It is even funnier. Not many people liked
the idea of paying for what they see as design mistake i.e. depending upon only
one database.

Of course that is /. and has only a definite wight to it but still.. Its funny..
Especially the request of co-operation was bounced from compiere developers IIRC.

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-03 19:15:47 Re: slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-11-03 14:09:48 slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere