| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere |
| Date: | 2003-11-03 19:15:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200311031115.47968.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Shridhar,
> You should have read the commentary. It is even funnier. Not many people
> liked the idea of paying for what they see as design mistake i.e. depending
> upon only one database.
>
> Of course that is /. and has only a definite wight to it but still.. Its
> funny.. Especially the request of co-operation was bounced from compiere
> developers IIRC.
Yeah ... I'm wondering if the poster who said that he sent in a donation a
year ago and can't get his e-mail returned is honest. I mean, jeez, if
Compiere development is being funded by re-selling Oracle licences, then
can't the project leads just be honest and say so? And if they are really
interested in a port, why the total lack of progress over a year?
Also, the bugbear of "database independance" is an issue to tackle one day ...
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-04 22:23:19 | Calling Robert Treat! |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-11-03 14:25:21 | Re: slashdot on PostgreSQL / compiere |