Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: David So <davidso(at)netband(dot)com(dot)hk>, Postgre General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Date: 2003-10-17 16:32:15
Message-ID: 3F90198F.1050304@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2003 05:34, David So wrote:
>>
>> For deploying PostgreSQL on Windoz platform, which one is a better
>> option (performance, reliability) ? Thru Cygwin or Paid version from
>> SRA?
>
> I know one person who was quite happy with the windows version from
> http://www.dbexperts.net/. He wanted a "spare" PG server but didn't have the
> time/inclination to learn how to manage a Linux server.

Yeah, that dbexperts version. Copy their dbx.dll to a unix box and run
"strings -a dbx.dll" and you'll see that this is a modified cygwin.dll
without sourcecode. I would be very careful these days in advertising that.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-10-17 16:57:24 Re: ShmemAlloc errors
Previous Message Vatsal 2003-10-17 16:22:01 Trigger within Transactions