From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GPL code in our CVS :-( |
Date: | 2003-09-30 12:47:33 |
Message-ID: | 3F797B65.2090303@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de]
>>Sent: 30 September 2003 09:18
>>To: Dave Page
>>Subject: Re: GPL code in our CVS :-(
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de]
>>>>Sent: 29 September 2003 23:51
>>>>To: Dave Page
>>>>Subject: Re: GPL code in our CVS :-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>that's taken 1:1 from pgsql backend, it's generated by
>>>>
>>>>
>>bison. The file
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>keywords.c needs it to compile. It supplies the official keyword
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>checking.
>>>
>>>The copyright says that the output file created by Bison *from* that
>>>file may be used without restriction. That file itself is
>>>
>>>
>>GPL according
>>
>>
>>>to the header.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>So PostgreSQL backend source restricted by this too.
>>
>>
>
>Looks like it. What can we do about it?
>
Dunno... The pgsql people must have discussed this, or did the copyright
notice invade the file while upgrading requirements to bison 1.875?
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Witney | 2003-09-30 12:58:16 | Re: pgAdmin III under wxCocoa |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-30 12:21:55 | Re: RPMS problems w/ RH 7.3 |