From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RPMS problems w/ RH 7.3 |
Date: | 2003-09-30 12:21:55 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B6E8@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 30 September 2003 12:06
> To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
> Cc: Dave Page; pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de;
> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: RPMS problems w/ RH 7.3
>
>
> On Tuesday, Sep 30, 2003, at 03:54 US/Eastern, Jean-Michel
> POURE wrote:
>
> > Le Mardi 30 Septembre 2003 09:35, Dave Page a écrit :
> >> Just as I applied it I read this bit! How easy would it be
> to detect
> >> rh73 and only add the relevant options where appropriate?
> >
> > You can detect a RedHat 7.3 host by running "rpm -q redhat-release",
> > but it is
> > not very clean. The best is to leave the user the choice to rebuild
> > the SRPM
> > using a flag.
> >
>
> Actually, there is a semi-clean way inside a SPEC file to
> apply a patch
> only when being built on a particular architecture. I'll send the
> relevant bits to the list later this morning (morning for me,
> that is!).
Cool, thanks Adam!
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-09-30 12:47:33 | Re: GPL code in our CVS :-( |
Previous Message | Adam H.Pendleton | 2003-09-30 11:05:30 | Re: RPMS problems w/ RH 7.3 |