| From: | Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | sequence's plpgsql | 
| Date: | 2003-09-24 16:40:04 | 
| Message-ID: | 3F71C8E4.1070309@tcd.ie | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc | 
Hi,
I've hit a little problem and was wondering if anyone might be able to 
give some help.
Set-up:
- JBoss appserver using entity beans to access database
- Using sequence pattern to update primary keys for several tables. 
Basically it is a method of getting primary keys without hitting the 
database. It actually hits the database every 10th go and updates the 
counter by 10 in the database.
(now the bold bit)
- We have a stored procedure that actually updates one of the sequences 
as well. It increments one at a time using this code:
    SELECT INTO NewPK pkIndex FROM PrimaryKeyGenerator WHERE Name = 
SequenceName FOR UPDATE;
    UPDATE PrimaryKeyGenerator SET pkIndex = NewPK + 1 WHERE Name = 
SequenceName;
I believe the "FOR UPDATE" won't actually do any good inside a plpgsql 
call. Am I right?
Problem:
I have just called this stored procedure from outside the system using 
10 threads and have got some errors due to duplicate entries on the 
unique index. If it was only the stored procedures using this pk 
generator then I could use a postgresql sequence but it isn't. If the 
entity beans were to use the sequence, they'd have to make a database 
call every time.
Any thoughts?
I'm thinking I may need to switch to using a sequence because the entity 
beans don't actually update this particular table very often but would 
prefer not to for portability reasons.
Thanks,
Tim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-09-24 16:42:00 | Re: career in SQL/Database administration | 
| Previous Message | btober | 2003-09-24 16:29:49 | Re: career in SQL/Database administration | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-24 16:47:15 | Re: [GENERAL] pgindented tsearch2 for 7.3.4 | 
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-09-24 16:39:53 | Re: pg_dump doesn't dump binary compatible casts | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-09-24 17:28:06 | Re: sequence's plpgsql | 
| Previous Message | Jim Wright | 2003-09-24 13:50:53 | Re: Help: ResultSet..insertRow() not coping with explicit |