Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Date: 2003-09-23 08:15:08
Message-ID: 3F70010C.9050604@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
> then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
> as possible.

This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-09-23 10:45:16 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Previous Message Barry Lind 2003-09-23 06:13:52 pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresq ...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-09-23 10:45:16 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2003-09-23 07:18:50 Re: missing pg_clog files ?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-09-23 08:57:26 Re: contrib mode - pgenv
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-09-23 02:44:27 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)