Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "'Gaetano Mendola'" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Date: 2003-09-23 10:45:16
Message-ID: 00d301c381bf$c8a5c6b0$3d283ddb@PbgX
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
> > then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
> > as possible.
>
> This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?

No.
It was not transaction-safe long time ago.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-09-23 12:56:35 pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog pre ...
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-09-23 08:15:08 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jasongodden 2003-09-23 12:20:33 Building from CVS issues
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-09-23 08:15:08 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-09-23 14:28:27 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2003-09-23 08:57:26 Re: contrib mode - pgenv