From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "'Gaetano Mendola'" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
Date: | 2003-09-23 10:45:16 |
Message-ID: | 00d301c381bf$c8a5c6b0$3d283ddb@PbgX |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
> > then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
> > as possible.
>
> This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?
No.
It was not transaction-safe long time ago.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-09-23 12:56:35 | pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg ChangeLog pre ... |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-09-23 08:15:08 | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jasongodden | 2003-09-23 12:20:33 | Building from CVS issues |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-09-23 08:15:08 | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-09-23 14:28:27 | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-09-23 08:57:26 | Re: contrib mode - pgenv |