| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore |
| Date: | 2003-09-16 22:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3F679026.80604@fireserve.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
ROTFLMAO!
That's just the trigger I needed for a belly laugh today. Thanks guys!
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
>
>
>>Not so sure on whether the foot gun is a good idea. We already have .22
>>calibre foot gun (fsync) that makes for pretty big improvements in load
>>speed, and we see people all the time on General and Performance running
>>production servers with it turned off. You know as well as I do the
>>second we make WAL optional, some people are gonna start running
>>production servers with it.
>>
>>
>
>it shouldn't be too difficult to put some sort of restrictions on its
>usual ... say if WAL disabled, max connections == 2? :)
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-09-16 22:46:15 | Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-16 22:16:18 | Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore |