Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore
Date: 2003-09-16 22:16:18
Message-ID: 20030916191516.W17406@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:

> Not so sure on whether the foot gun is a good idea. We already have .22
> calibre foot gun (fsync) that makes for pretty big improvements in load
> speed, and we see people all the time on General and Performance running
> production servers with it turned off. You know as well as I do the
> second we make WAL optional, some people are gonna start running
> production servers with it.

it shouldn't be too difficult to put some sort of restrictions on its
usual ... say if WAL disabled, max connections == 2? :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-09-16 22:35:18 Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-09-16 21:39:47 Re: State of Beta 2