| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-22 17:19:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3F465095.5040701@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> Okay, my proposal would be to have a VACUUM mode where it tells the
>> buffer manager to only return a page if it is already in memory, and
>> some "not cached" if it would have to read it from disk, and simply skip
>> the page in that case.
>
> Since no such call is available at the OS level, this would only work
> well with very large shared_buffers settings (ie, you try to rely on
> PG shared buffers to the exclusion of kernel disk cache). AFAIK the
> general consensus is that that's not a good way to run Postgres.
Oh-kay ... so yes Manfred, your RSM is probably the better way.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Schapachnik | 2003-08-22 17:23:11 | Re: pg_dump and alter database |
| Previous Message | Johnson, Shaunn | 2003-08-22 17:00:57 | convert interval info into days |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Rawnsley | 2003-08-22 19:48:45 | Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-22 16:56:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |