Re: [HACKERS] Buglist

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buglist
Date: 2003-08-22 17:19:17
Message-ID: 3F465095.5040701@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> Okay, my proposal would be to have a VACUUM mode where it tells the
>> buffer manager to only return a page if it is already in memory, and
>> some "not cached" if it would have to read it from disk, and simply skip
>> the page in that case.
>
> Since no such call is available at the OS level, this would only work
> well with very large shared_buffers settings (ie, you try to rely on
> PG shared buffers to the exclusion of kernel disk cache). AFAIK the
> general consensus is that that's not a good way to run Postgres.

Oh-kay ... so yes Manfred, your RSM is probably the better way.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Schapachnik 2003-08-22 17:23:11 Re: pg_dump and alter database
Previous Message Johnson, Shaunn 2003-08-22 17:00:57 convert interval info into days

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Rawnsley 2003-08-22 19:48:45 Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-22 16:56:01 Re: [HACKERS] Buglist