From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Buglist |
Date: | 2003-09-05 02:54:29 |
Message-ID: | 200309050254.h852sTG21115@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >> Okay, my proposal would be to have a VACUUM mode where it tells the
> >> buffer manager to only return a page if it is already in memory, and
> >> some "not cached" if it would have to read it from disk, and simply skip
> >> the page in that case.
> >
> > Since no such call is available at the OS level, this would only work
> > well with very large shared_buffers settings (ie, you try to rely on
> > PG shared buffers to the exclusion of kernel disk cache). AFAIK the
> > general consensus is that that's not a good way to run Postgres.
>
> Oh-kay ... so yes Manfred, your RSM is probably the better way.
Added to TODO.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-09-05 04:12:10 | Re: Optimizer picks an ineffient plan |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-05 02:51:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-09-05 02:57:50 | Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-05 02:51:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist) |