Re: [HACKERS] Buglist

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Buglist
Date: 2003-09-05 02:54:29
Message-ID: 200309050254.h852sTG21115@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >> Okay, my proposal would be to have a VACUUM mode where it tells the
> >> buffer manager to only return a page if it is already in memory, and
> >> some "not cached" if it would have to read it from disk, and simply skip
> >> the page in that case.
> >
> > Since no such call is available at the OS level, this would only work
> > well with very large shared_buffers settings (ie, you try to rely on
> > PG shared buffers to the exclusion of kernel disk cache). AFAIK the
> > general consensus is that that's not a good way to run Postgres.
>
> Oh-kay ... so yes Manfred, your RSM is probably the better way.

Added to TODO.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-09-05 04:12:10 Re: Optimizer picks an ineffient plan
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-05 02:51:48 Re: [HACKERS] Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-09-05 02:57:50 Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-05 02:51:48 Re: [HACKERS] Decent VACUUM (was: Buglist)