Re: Peformance of Update

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Peformance of Update
Date: 2003-08-11 13:26:08
Message-ID: 3F37E6C8.24039.1A81422F@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 11 Aug 2003 at 19:33, whchung(at)popularworld(dot)com wrote:
> Currently we are using postgresql 7.3 with Redhat linux 9. We find that
> when we try to execute 200,000 update statement through JDBC, the performance
> of degraded obviously for each update statement when comparing with less update
> statement(eg. 5000). Is there any suggestion that we can improve the
> performance for executing update statementat postgresql ? Thanks.

How are you bunching your transactions? I mean how many updates per
transaction?

And have you tried moving WAL to separate disk for such a update heavy
environment? Have you are tuned FSM to take care of dead tuples generated in
vacuum? Are you running autovacuum daemon?

All these things are almost a must for such update heavy environment..

Bye
Shridhar

--
Moore's Constant: Everybody sets out to do something, and everybody does
something, but no one does what he sets out to do.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stef 2003-08-11 13:58:41 Analyze makes queries slow...
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-08-11 13:24:29 Re: How to force PostgreeSQL to work faster?