| From: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with debian package version number |
| Date: | 2003-08-04 21:58:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3F2ED716.4020400@club-internet.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>I was intending to follow the pga2 convention:
>0.9.0 beta 1
>0.9.1 beta 1 dev 1
>0.9.2 beta 1 dev 2
>....
>0.9.14 beta 2
>and so on. We then release 1.0.0.
>1.0.1 is refresh 1 of 1.0
>1.1.x is the new development branch that will become 1.2.x at release, thus odd minor versions are development, and even are stable.
>
>
Nice! I vote for this one :)
Something that has less to do with version number but which is quite
important to me: ./pkg/debian/make-deb is missing from snapshots, can
one of you do the magic trick that will make it appear ? Is there also
anyway that ./pkg/debian/rules is set mode 755 out of the box ?
Cheers,
Raphaël
P.S. Hey Dave, I love your bike! ;p
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-04 22:09:02 | Re: Problem with debian package version number |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-04 21:56:36 | Re: pga3 website |