Re: Problem with debian package version number

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 04 August 2003 21:14
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem with debian package
> version number
>
>
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> > Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> >
> >> I did a big mistake when I began to number debian packages... What
> >> are you planning to do concerning the pgAdmin3 version
> number for the
> >> beta release ? Will this stay 0.8.0 ? Or will this become
> something
> >> else greater than 0.8.0 (would be nice...) ? Does someone
> has an idea
> >> of the date this release is planned ?
> >
> > Hi Raphaël,
> > so far we don't have an agreed schema of numbering, so this is the
> > right moment to make proposals and decide.
> > IMHO, the first beta will be 0.90, following development versions
> > 0.91, the second beta 0.92, ...
>

I was intending to follow the pga2 convention:

0.9.0 beta 1
0.9.1 beta 1 dev 1
0.9.2 beta 1 dev 2
...
0.9.14 beta 2

and so on. We then release 1.0.0.

1.0.1 is refresh 1 of 1.0
1.1.x is the new development branch that will become 1.2.x at release, thus odd minor versions are development, and even are stable.

Regards, Dave