From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Relation of indices to ANALYZE |
Date: | 2003-07-17 18:51:10 |
Message-ID: | 3F16F01E.2040403@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Specifically, I'm wondering if I should do
>>the ANALYZE before or after I recreate the indexes, or whether it matters.
>
>
> At the moment it does not matter --- ANALYZE computes statistics for
> each column of a table regardless of what indexes exist.
>
> There has been some talk of trying to compute statistics for the
> contents of functional indexes. Also, if we ever do anything about
> computing multicolumn correlation statistics, we'd likely choose which
> ones are worth computing based on the presence of multicolumn indexes.
> So if you want to future-proof your code I'd recommend recreating the
> indexes before you ANALYZE.
Thanks, Tom (and everyone else who replied).
I'm already recreating the indices prior to the VACUUM ANALYZE, since this
puts the database back in a more usable state faster than doing the
VACUUM first. It's good to know that it will probably be the proper way
to do things in the future as well.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2003-07-17 18:55:29 | Re: Hardware performance |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-07-17 18:41:52 | Re: Hardware performance |