From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware performance |
Date: | 2003-07-17 18:41:52 |
Message-ID: | 20030717184152.GG479@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:57:53AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
>
> As I said, I've never personally found it necessary to move WAL off to a
> different physical drive. What do you think is the best configuration
On our Solaris test boxes (where, alas, we do not have the luxury of
1/2 TB external RAID boxes :-( ), putting WAL on a disk of its own
yielded something like 30% improvement in throughput on high
transaciton volumes. So it's definitely important in some cases.
A
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2003-07-17 18:51:10 | Re: Relation of indices to ANALYZE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-17 18:27:16 | Re: Relation of indices to ANALYZE |