From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hardware performance |
Date: | 2003-07-17 16:29:18 |
Message-ID: | 3F16CEDE.2070807@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Adam Witney wrote:
> Actually I am going through the same questions myself at the moment.... I
> would like to have a 2 disk RAID1 and a 4 disk RAID5, so need at least 6
> disks....
>
> Anybody have any suggestions or experience with other hardware manufacturers
> for this size of setup? (2U rack, up to 6 disks, 2 processors, ~2GB RAM, if
> possible)
I tend to use either 1U or 4U servers, depending on the application. But
I've had good experiences with IBM recently, and a quick look on their
site shows the x345 with these specs:
• 2U, 2-way server delivers extreme performance and availability for
demanding applications
• Up to 2 Intel Xeon processors up to 3.06GHz with 533MHz front-side
bus speed for outstanding performance
• Features up to 8GB of DDR memory, 5 PCI (4 PCI-X) slots and up to 6
hard disk drives for robust expansion
• Hot-swap redundant cooling, power and hard disk drives for high
availability
• Integrated dual Ultra320 SCSI with RAID-1 for data protection
This may not wrap well, but here is the url:
http://www-132.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=-840&storeId=1&categoryId=2559454&langId=-1&dualCurrId=73
Handles 6 drives; maybe that fits the bill?
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-07-17 16:40:21 | Re: Sanity check requested |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-07-17 16:21:32 | Re: Hardware performance |