From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Lane <slane(at)moyergroup(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Date: | 2003-06-11 21:14:55 |
Message-ID: | 3EE79BCF.7090409@cvc.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I could really use some links to these performance comparisons. Oracle performance statistics are problematic though,as all contracts to use Oracle require the user to NEVER share performance information to the public. Someone should sue them for that. Or figure out a way to influence the market to start being pissed off about that.
Anyway, I'm going to write a paper for my masters on using PGSL vs. Oracle vs. SQL Server vs. DB2. Any and all sources of performance, usage, configurations, etc of these would be most welcome.
Steve Lane wrote:
> On 6/11/03 10:39 AM, "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
>>Tell him to test it with decent settings (try about 4000 for each as an
>>initial start), and he'll find that a decently tuned PostgreSQL matches
>>the speed of a MySQL installation with any table type. An in
>>write-intensive applications, the MySQL server will always fall behind.
>>_Especially_ as the number of simultaneous clients rises. MySQL falls
>>behind, as does Oracle 8i a bit further on (not sure about 9i and 9iR2),
>>and PostgreSQL keeps on performing at pretty much the same throughput
>>for far higher numbers of client connections.
>>
>>And _that_, is for real.
>>
>
>
> Are there *any* recent benchmarks that show all this? The most recent ones I
> can find are a couple of years old. Now, eWeek did run a database benchmark
> some time in the last year, in which they compared a variety of commercial
> engines and an OS engine. We can guess which was the open source db. MySQL
> of course.
>
> If anyone in the advocacy area wants to write to the eWeek author who did
> the report, Timothy Dyck, it'd be good to push for a benchmark that includes
> postgres. Of course, since we're all involved in advocacy in some way, I
> could do it myself...
>
> Anyway, original question ... Any recent benchmarks that show how postgres
> performs against others, especially under load?
>
> -- sgl
>
>
> =======================================================
> Steve Lane
>
> Vice President
> The Moyer Group
> 14 North Peoria St Suite 2H
> Chicago, IL 60607
>
> Voice: (312) 433-2421 Email: slane(at)moyergroup(dot)com
> Fax: (312) 850-3930 Web: http://www.moyergroup.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gould | 2003-06-11 21:18:39 | Re: Pg_dumpall |
Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-06-11 20:57:45 | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |