From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | gearond(at)cvc(dot)net |
Cc: | P G <pg_dba(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How does PostgreSQL treat null values in unique composite |
Date: | 2003-04-08 19:00:03 |
Message-ID: | 3E931C33.4050601@cvc.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
think of NULL as a placeholder for a future value.
Dennis Gearon wrote:
> the sql paradigm says NULL is 'unknown'
>
> So, you can have unique values in a column, but the unknown ones are
> ignored. this can be very handy, but is best used only in date/date
> related fields because NULLS complicate many SQL statements.
>
> P G wrote:
>
>> I have the following table with a unique constraint.
>>
>> create table testt (
>> id int,
>> aa int,
>> bb int,
>> constraint pk_testt primary key (id),
>> constraint cons_testt unique (aa,bb));
>>
>> Let's say I insert the following:
>>
>> insert into testt values (1,2,null);
>> insert into testt values (2,2,null);
>>
>> I thought this should fail because of the unique
>> constraint, but it doesn't. How does PostgreSQL view
>> the null values in this constraint? Will someone
>> explain why I am allowed to make this insertion?
>>
>> TIA.
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
>> http://tax.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc | 2003-04-08 19:01:00 | Re: The mail nttp gateway is still broken |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-04-08 18:46:41 | Re: How does PostgreSQL treat null values in unique composite |