| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | P G <pg_dba(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How does PostgreSQL treat null values in unique composite |
| Date: | 2003-04-08 18:46:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3E931911.7030401@cvc.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
the sql paradigm says NULL is 'unknown'
So, you can have unique values in a column, but the unknown ones are ignored.
this can be very handy, but is best used only in date/date related fields
because NULLS complicate many SQL statements.
P G wrote:
> I have the following table with a unique constraint.
>
> create table testt (
> id int,
> aa int,
> bb int,
> constraint pk_testt primary key (id),
> constraint cons_testt unique (aa,bb));
>
> Let's say I insert the following:
>
> insert into testt values (1,2,null);
> insert into testt values (2,2,null);
>
> I thought this should fail because of the unique
> constraint, but it doesn't. How does PostgreSQL view
> the null values in this constraint? Will someone
> explain why I am allowed to make this insertion?
>
> TIA.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-04-08 19:00:03 | Re: How does PostgreSQL treat null values in unique composite |
| Previous Message | Medi Montaseri | 2003-04-08 18:32:05 | Re: Arrays ... need clarification.... |