Re: 7.3.1 takes long time to vacuum table?

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3.1 takes long time to vacuum table?
Date: 2003-02-20 13:59:50
Message-ID: 3E552CAE.29144.362F46@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 20 Feb 2003 at 13:23, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:

> P.S. Have just received your other email while writing this, and the
> procedure you described is pretty close to what we're doing. However, we
> need to manually add back various constraints/default values into the
> table columns which is a bit of a pain... wish it could be a little more
> automatic.

Well, postgresql DDL's are transaction safe. So if you rename a table in a
transaction, that won't be visible until you commit transaction.

That is the reason I described transaction in my last mail. If you encapsulate
it that way, it should not affect any referential constraints anyway. At least
that is the theory. Try it and let us know..

Bye
Shridhar

--
intoxicated, adj.: When you feel sophisticated without being able to pronounce
it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Harding 2003-02-20 14:24:15 Re: Should this scare me?
Previous Message Philippe Kiener 2003-02-20 13:38:21 Changing text encoding rapidly