From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Boget <chris(at)wild(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Garamond <davegaramond(at)icqmail(dot)com>, "j(dot)random(dot)programmer" <javadesigner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments |
Date: | 2002-12-04 14:20:22 |
Message-ID: | 3DEE0F26.20400@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Chris Boget wrote:
>>>4) The auto-increment ("serial") fields are very
>>>badly documented.
>>
>>since you came from the mysql world, this is understandable. mysql
>>doesn't have a "serial". it only has "autoincrement field." a
>>convenience, at best. not very flexible.
>
>
> What's the difference between the two? Autoincrement and serial?
> Unless I missed something in the docs, it didn't appear that there
> was any difference.
Hi Chris,
Do you have the ability to view Flash presentations?
If so, then serial/sequences are pretty well illustrated here:
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/college/001_sequences/index.php
Hope that helps.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-04 14:21:44 | Re: pg_relcheck gone from 7.3? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-04 14:09:46 | Re: Segmentation fault in 7.3 |