Re: Segmentation fault in 7.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in 7.3
Date: 2002-12-04 14:09:46
Message-ID: 13737.1039010986@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl> writes:
> Is this known behaviour?

Nope.

> Otherwise, I'd be glad to assist with a backtrace.

Please.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2002-12-04 14:33:08 Re: The Web Sites (Was: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Gl...)
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-12-04 14:05:50 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-12-04 14:20:22 Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2002-12-04 14:02:56 Re: Backend message type 0x50 arrived while idle

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2002-12-04 14:33:08 Re: The Web Sites (Was: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Gl...)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-12-04 14:06:52 Re: how to alter sequence.