Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Date: 2002-08-09 01:46:05
Message-ID: 3D531EDD.9060508@pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Curt Sampson wrote:
> On 8 Aug 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
>
>>The main difference (in the inheritance part) is that a relation does
>>not have one fixed set of fields, but can have any additional fields
>>added in inherited tables and still be part of to the base table as
>>well.
>
>
> This is trivial to do with a view.

And views of this sort are trivial to do using PG's OO extensions.

I think I see a trend in this thread. Why not give it up, dude?

--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J. R. Nield 2002-08-09 01:55:25 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-09 01:38:38 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?