Re: Did someone break CVS?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Did someone break CVS?
Date: 2002-08-05 02:23:11
Message-ID: 3D4DE18F.FBEF9051@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> In general I think that removing MAX_PG_PATH limits is a rather
> pointless exercise --- no one has yet complained that MAX_PG_PATH is too
> small.

I just mentioned it in passing; that wasn't the point of the changes.

Is there a design pattern that would ask us to enforce that length
limit? If so, I'd be happy to do so; if not, it doesn't much matter...

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gene Selkov, Jr. 2002-08-05 02:26:16 HASH: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-05 02:10:20 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka