Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Date: 2002-08-04 21:45:29
Message-ID: 3D4DA079.2020708@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>Again, a patch is attached that clearly needs fixing. I should have
>>tested this more, but I am heading out now and wanted to get it in
>>before more code drifted.
>
>
> Would you mind backing it out, instead? I've got major merge problems
> now because I wasn't expecting that to be applied yet (it's still
> completely unreviewed AFAIK).

I just got back -- sorry about the problem. By all means, back it out
and I'll work up a new patch based on current cvs.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-04 22:02:27 Re: Error: missing chunk number ...
Previous Message Neophytos Demetriou 2002-08-04 21:15:41 Error: missing chunk number ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-05 00:26:44 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-04 21:08:45 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)