Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)
Date: 2002-08-04 21:08:45
Message-ID: 12618.1028495325@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Again, a patch is attached that clearly needs fixing. I should have
> tested this more, but I am heading out now and wanted to get it in
> before more code drifted.

Would you mind backing it out, instead? I've got major merge problems
now because I wasn't expecting that to be applied yet (it's still
completely unreviewed AFAIK).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neophytos Demetriou 2002-08-04 21:15:41 Error: missing chunk number ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-04 21:04:10 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/tcop/postgres.c backe ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-04 21:45:29 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 19:59:31 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)