| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Date: | 2002-07-04 00:37:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3D2398C4.AAFBDBC1@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > As I remember, Hiroshi's drop column changed the attribute number to a
> > > special negative value, which required lots of changes to track.
> >
> > ??? What do you mean by *lots of* ?
>
> Yes, please remind me. Was your solution renumbering the attno values?
Yes though I don't intend to object to Christopher's proposal.
> I think there are fewer cases to fix if we keep the existing attribute
> numbering and just mark the column as deleted. Is this accurate?
No. I don't understand why you think so.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-04 00:38:04 | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-07-04 00:26:01 | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |