| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Date: | 2002-07-04 00:25:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200207040025.g640PtO27157@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > As I remember, Hiroshi's drop column changed the attribute number to a
> > special negative value, which required lots of changes to track.
>
> ??? What do you mean by *lots of* ?
Yes, please remind me. Was your solution renumbering the attno values?
I think there are fewer cases to fix if we keep the existing attribute
numbering and just mark the column as deleted. Is this accurate?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-07-04 00:26:01 | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2002-07-03 22:41:24 | Compiling PostgreSQL with Intel C Compiler 6.0 |