Re: URGENT: Performance tuning

From: "Mr(dot) Sandman" <no(at)spam(dot)xyz>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: URGENT: Performance tuning
Date: 2002-06-23 04:03:00
Message-ID: 3D15477F.3925F931@spam.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter Dimov wrote:
>
> --0-1863467882-1024751590=:63919
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi,
> Curt, you are rigth. I tested it.
> My idea was only to compare postgres with oracle and to see if it is good.
> I got the simplest example with simple data inserting.
> I do not have any answer on my questin:
> Is postgres good as performace compared to oracle and if yes how to fine tune it.
> I readet all docs that Ifound, changed shared buffers and sort chache but can not
> get good result.
>
> And the second question:
> Was enyone from the list a good perofmed postgres and if yes can I receiv this test result.
> If no one had good tuned postgres I do not see the need to use it. For me it can be only "play", demo or...?
>
In many ways, yes indeed, Oracle is better than Postgres, and many other
db's as well. But it is very expensive, and Postgres is free. So what
do you want?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Thornton 2002-06-23 05:12:11 pg_restore: [archiver] input file does not appear to be a valid archive
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-23 03:45:33 Re: Contrib reindex script: