From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | sthomas(at)townnews(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Contrib reindex script: |
Date: | 2002-06-23 03:45:33 |
Message-ID: | 200206230345.g5N3jX912863@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > First, I think we need a section in the admin/maintenance manual talking
> > about reindex. (We already have vacuum there, and I think reindex is
> > something that periodically also should be done.)
>
> One simple improvement would be to change the documentation's view of
> REINDEX -- at the moment, it says that it's only useful for rebuilding
> "corrupted indexes". If it's a legitimate maintainence activity for
> certain query loads, it should get a more positive spin.
Done.
> Also, could we enhance REINDEX to not require an exclusive table lock?
> Without looking at the code, I would think that we could at least allow
> for SELECTs (using seqscans or other indexes) while a REINDEX is running.
Yes, that would be nice.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mr. Sandman | 2002-06-23 04:03:00 | Re: URGENT: Performance tuning |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-23 03:36:45 | Re: Contrib: Reindex script. |