Re: PostGres Doubt

From: David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGres Doubt
Date: 2002-06-18 15:58:53
Message-ID: 3D0F58BD.7070109@blue-labs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gotcha. 'twas the first time I encountered it, I wasn't expecting it.

Thank you for the clarification. I hadn't paid attention to that
paragraph when I read over it.

David

Tom Lane wrote:

>David Ford <david(at)blue-labs(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>>heakin=> \z
>>Access privileges for database "heakin"
>> Table | Access privileges
>>-------------------+-------------------
>> interviewers |
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>heakin=> grant select,insert,update on interviewers to heakin;
>>GRANT
>>heakin=> \z
>>Access privileges for database "heakin"
>> Table | Access privileges
>>-------------------+--------------------
>> interviewers | {=,heakin=arwdRxt}
>>
>>
>
>I take it heakin is the owner of the table in question. As such,
>he implicitly has all privileges --- the initial null privilege list
>is a shorthand for what you see explicitly in the second case.
>
>The GRANT man page in current development sources has an example about
>this; see the Notes section of
>http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-grant.html
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-06-18 16:06:11 Re: PostGres Doubt
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-06-18 15:56:38 Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port