From: | "Michael G(dot) Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge |
Date: | 2002-06-12 23:44:37 |
Message-ID: | 3D07DCE5.8030503@vpmonline.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Ok, I'll keep track of how many pages change between updates and play
with the max_fsm_pages value. I'll post my findings.
--Michael
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Michael G. Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>That's what I was beginning to think from reading. I just wasn't sure
>>of the correlation between MAX_FSM_PAGES and the actual pages occupied
>>by the table after a full vacuum. 1:1 ?? Any general rules?
>>
>>
>
>1:1 would be worst case, probably. The real question is how many pages
>get dirtied between vacuums --- so you can trade off more frequent
>vacuums for a smaller free space map.
>
>We don't have a lot of experience yet with tuning that parameter (if
>we did, there'd be advice in the manual). Please report anything
>you learn from experimentation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yuen Joyce | 2002-06-13 09:57:49 | |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-12 23:30:06 | Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge |