Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge

From: "Michael G(dot) Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge
Date: 2002-06-12 23:44:37
Message-ID: 3D07DCE5.8030503@vpmonline.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Ok, I'll keep track of how many pages change between updates and play
with the max_fsm_pages value. I'll post my findings.

--Michael

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Michael G. Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>That's what I was beginning to think from reading. I just wasn't sure
>>of the correlation between MAX_FSM_PAGES and the actual pages occupied
>>by the table after a full vacuum. 1:1 ?? Any general rules?
>>
>>
>
>1:1 would be worst case, probably. The real question is how many pages
>get dirtied between vacuums --- so you can trade off more frequent
>vacuums for a smaller free space map.
>
>We don't have a lot of experience yet with tuning that parameter (if
>we did, there'd be advice in the manual). Please report anything
>you learn from experimentation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuen Joyce 2002-06-13 09:57:49
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-12 23:30:06 Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge