Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge

From: "Michael G(dot) Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge
Date: 2002-06-12 22:37:11
Message-ID: 3D07CD17.5060903@vpmonline.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks Tom,

That's what I was beginning to think from reading. I just wasn't sure
of the correlation between MAX_FSM_PAGES and the actual pages occupied
by the table after a full vacuum. 1:1 ?? Any general rules?

Thanks,
Michael

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Michael G. Martin" <michael(at)vpmonline(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>VACUUM verbose symbol_Data;
>>NOTICE: --Relation symbol_data--
>>NOTICE: Pages 767990: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 21595176: Vac 0, Keep 0,
>>
>>
> ^^^^^^
>
>
>>UnUsed 16560877.
>> Total CPU 61.94s/6.94u sec elapsed 179.25 sec.
>>
>>
>
>That seems to be a couple orders of magnitude above the default size of
>the free space map (10000 pages IIRC). How big is your database in
>total? You definitely need to increase MAX_FSM_PAGES in
>postgresql.conf, but I can't tell how far on the basis of this one
>datapoint.
>
>You will probably want to do a VACUUM FULL to clean out some of the free
>space and then see where you really stand on number of pages.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael G. Martin 2002-06-12 23:14:46 Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-12 22:32:26 Re: UnUsed Tuple Space Huge