Re: Really stupid question(?)

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bear Giles <bgiles(at)coyotesong(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Really stupid question(?)
Date: 2002-05-23 20:29:47
Message-ID: 3CED513B.1070805@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bear Giles wrote:
> The really stupid question refers to some of the hardcoded fallback
> values in this code. The reason for having hardcoded values is to
> prevent "downgrade" attacks - you don't want to casually override the
> DBA, but you also don't want to make it easy for a knowledgeable
> attacker to fatally compromise the system in a way that your average
> DBA couldn't catch.
>
> But the problem is that knowledgeable security administrators can
> replace the common hardcoded values with their own. How do you allow
> this to be easily done?

Would GUC variables work? Put in sensible defaults and let the more
knowledgeable security admins override the defaults in postgresql.conf

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Castle 2002-05-23 22:04:17 Re: Psql 7.2.1 Regress tests failed on RedHat 7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-23 20:10:39 Re: Really stupid question(?)