| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bear Giles <bgiles(at)coyotesong(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Really stupid question(?) |
| Date: | 2002-05-23 20:10:39 |
| Message-ID: | 23309.1022184639@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bear Giles <bgiles(at)coyotesong(dot)com> writes:
> But the problem is that knowledgeable security administrators can
> replace the common hardcoded values with their own. How do you allow
> this to be easily done?
Configuration parameters?
> One possibility that occured to me was that dynamic libraries would
> handle this nicely. There's even some support for dynamic libraries
> in the user-defined functions, so this wouldn't be a totally
> unprecedented idea.
> But this would be a new way of using dynamic libraries.
You've lost me completely. What exactly are you suggesting?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-23 20:29:47 | Re: Really stupid question(?) |
| Previous Message | Bear Giles | 2002-05-23 17:48:54 | Really stupid question(?) |