Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to

From: David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to
Date: 2002-04-22 00:31:38
Message-ID: 3CC359EA.4050509@blue-labs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'm not sure, but being that there was only one connect statement, and
1/4 of the tables were there, I have no idea what went wrong. I
imported it by hand so I should have noticed if anything was amiss.

David

Neil Conway wrote:

>On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:10:19 -0400
>"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
>>David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org> writes:
>>
>>
>>>This then begs the question, why are they not in the hmzbook database?
>>> All the tables were added via psql -f /tmp/dump.hmzbook which has one
>>>connect line in it. \connect hmzbook xxxx.
>>>
>>>
>>What would happen if that \connect command failed for some reason?
>>(hmzbook not there, wrong user, authentication failure, ...)
>>
>>
>
>AFAICT psql should bail out and not continue to restore the dump --
>which is probably the most reasonable behavior, anyway.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Neil
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-22 00:40:13 Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-04-21 23:21:18 Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to