| From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org, thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to |
| Date: | 2002-04-21 23:21:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20020421192118.2923e49f.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:10:19 -0400
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org> writes:
> > This then begs the question, why are they not in the hmzbook database?
> > All the tables were added via psql -f /tmp/dump.hmzbook which has one
> > connect line in it. \connect hmzbook xxxx.
>
> What would happen if that \connect command failed for some reason?
> (hmzbook not there, wrong user, authentication failure, ...)
AFAICT psql should bail out and not continue to restore the dump --
which is probably the most reasonable behavior, anyway.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Ford | 2002-04-22 00:31:38 | Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 23:10:19 | Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to |